Archive for August, 2007

Bird Flu Vacinnes - Testing and Tests

Posted on 26 August 2007 in Uncategorized by admin

Recent tests conducted in Vietnam and China indicate that Chinese bird flu vaccines used among poultry in Vietnam are still effective, local newspaper Labor reported today.
After testing samples taken in this year’s bird flu outbreaks in the two northern provinces of Hai Duong and Ninh Binh and the two southern provinces of Bac Lieu and Hau Giang, Vietnamese experts found that Chinese H5N1 vaccines can protect 90-95 percent of vaccinated fowls from being attacked by the disease.
The experts at the Department of Animal Health under the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development sent 15 samples taken in different Vietnamese localities hit by bird flu in late 2006 and early 2007 to China for testing. Analysis of Chinese experts shows that the protection rate among chickens reaches 100 percent.
Vietnam has so far this year vaccinated over 161.5 million fowls, mainly chickens and ducks, against bird flu viruses. Now, three Vietnamese provinces, Dien Bien and Cao Bang in the North and Dong Thap in the South, are being hit by bird flu, according to the department.

Mmedical Tourism

  www.mmedsolution.com

Sphere: Related Content

Misconceptions, Misunderstandings and Downright Mistruths about Facial Cosmetic Surgeries

Posted on 19 August 2007 in Uncategorized by admin

Misconceptions About Facials it’s normal to break out after a facial this is the mother of all facial myths. Shoot. If I had a dime for every time I heard this, well…let’s just say Elizabeth Arden would be renamed Elizabeth Quesnelle. There is absolutely no reason you should break out after a facial. If you do it’s because the technician used the wrong products, causing irritation and inflammation, or because they did not do extractions correctly. When an esthetician performs extractions, he/she looks at each pore/blemish/blackhead and assesses whether it can be safely extracted. If the esthetician thinks that it’s ready to come out, then they begin gently pushing on the area, working the debris out. If, after applying gentle pressure, the impurities are not budging, then it should be left alone. If the esthetician continues to force it out, then you can end up with a busted follicle wall and the spreading of bacteria into other follicles or even a scar. I can do these treatments at home for much cheaper you can do treatments at home, and they would cost you less money, but you won’t get the results you can at the hands of a professional esthetician. Estheticians are able to use to look at your skin and correctly diagnose each area and determine the best course of treatment. Over 50% of women incorrectly identified their skin type according to a recent study published by a beauty publication. Usually, people mistake their skin for being oilier than it actually is. Therefore, they gravitate towards those with oil controlling properties, which can seriously throw off the balance of the skin by making it way too dry. I have to purchase every product, every time sometimes it seems as though if you don’t immediately purchase the recommended product your skin will fall off. Not so. Make educated choices about your skin care. Ask the technician why he/she is recommending that you take home that product today. If they can’t give you a well thought out or intelligent and scientific answer, then you may want to pass on the purchase. Take the name of the product home and do your own research on the web. Also, don’t be afraid to tell your esthetician that you are on a budget and ask what one product at the spa/salon is essential in their opinion. Follow that up by asking what drugstore brands will work well with your skin and the one salon/spa product. Your skin’s health and appearance are very important, but you shouldn’t have to break the bank to take care of it. There are things that work (and don’t work) at all price points. It’s OK for the technician to leave the room there are different thoughts on this, but I firmly believe that your esthetician should be with you in the treatment room 100% of the time. Some of the products we use are aggressive. To leave when an acid or enzyme is on the skin is inexcusable, in my book. Usually, estheticians leave because they are working on two clients in two separate rooms at one time. Places where this factory-mentality exists should be avoided, in my opinion. Your skin is too important to be treated with split focus. When making an appointment, ask the receptionist if they book multiple facials for each esthetician per hour. Or, ask the esthetician before the treatment begins if he/she will be in the treatment room at all times. This is particularly important during body treatments, where there is a real possibility of overheating or becoming claustrophobic. Extractions should hurt No pain, no gain doesn’t apply to the world of skin care. Extractions may not be the most pleasant part of the facial, but they should not cause a great deal of pain. If the esthetician is using too much pressure, ask him/her to go easier on your skin. It is possible to have effective extractions without applying what feels like 5 tons of weight to your skin. The oil used to massage my face will make me break out I have personally heard this from nervous clients during the massage portion of the facial. I can absolutely understand where the concern comes from. We have been taught that oil is bad. Oil causes blemishes. Nothing is further from the truth. The oil that is produced in our skin (which is known as sebum) lubricates our skin and provides an additional protective layer against bacteria and particulate matter. Often times, we create our own oily skin issues by scrubbing so much away that our body responds by over-producing the sebum. It’s a vicious cycle. The oil that should be used on the face during a massage should be olive, grapeseed, jojoba, or apricot kernel. These oils are molecularly similar to our bodies own oils, so the skin readily accepts them in. Since breakouts don’t come from oil, the addition of these products to the skin serves to provide lubrication and deep moisturization. Facials are for pampering, dermatologists are for results actually, for many minor and common skin ailments, seeing an esthetician can help immensely. Those with excessively dry, oily, acne and even rosacea have found that facials have helped keep their skin balanced and their trips to the doctor few and far between. Estheticians are uniquely qualified to work with the client on daily skin care regimens, teaching them to tend for their skin. Dermatologists sometimes see the condition and not how the skin as a whole needs to be treated. They are far too busy to instruct their patients on proper home care. Estheticians in no way take the place of a dermatologist. It is still ESSENTIAL for all people to see their dermatologist at least once a year for a skin cancer checks and certainly if they have any sudden change in the skin that could represent disease.

Medical Travel

Import Car Canada

 

www.mmedicalsolution.com

 

Sphere: Related Content

And Yet a Double Edged Example of Medical Care in the Western “Industrialized World”

Posted on 18 August 2007 in Uncategorized by admin

We finally have good operating understanding of “universal” health care: somewhere in the universe there may be a place for you to get treatment. And if you are lucky enough to live near the United States before Hillary Care II takes hold, you may even get treated.

Canada welcomes the birth of the newest set of quadruplets born to proud Canadian parents. Karen and J.P. Jeep. However, the Jeep quads will be eligible to run for the presidency of the United States when they reach the age of 35, having been born in Benefits Hospital in Great Falls, Montana, 325 miles from their home in Calgary, capital of the Canadian oil industry.
The precious gift of American citizenship comes to the Jeep Quads because there were no hospital facilities anywhere in Canada able to handle 4 neonatal intensive care babies. Not in Calgary, a city of over a million people, the wealthiest in Canada, or anywhere else in Canada. Local officials looked.

However, Great Falls, a city of well under one hundred thousand people, apparently had no problem with unusual demand for such facilities.
As Don Surber points out, the United States functions as Canada’s back-up medical system, enabling it to run with less investment in facilities. America’s evil, heartless private medical care system saved the day. In any capital-intensive field, whether it be electric power generation or medicine, gearing up for peak demand costs a lot of money. California discovered this a few years ago when it started to experience rolling blackouts in the wake of bungled partial deregulation of power.

America spends significantly more on medical care than Canada. Socialized medicine advocates frequently claim that this shows we are getting a bad deal: less care for more money. But the fact is that illegal alien mothers walk into hospital emergency rooms and give birth to babies requiring intensive neonatal care costing hundreds of thousands of dollars on a regular basis, and it makes no headlines. We do not send them over the border to Canada or Mexico and use their medical systems as a back-up, even when the mother might be a citizen of that country. We treat them, and pick-up the bill, too, without so much as a citizenship check or a call to immigration officials.

Steven M. Warshawsky demonstrates today on AT that there is no such thing as “free” medical care. Having the government pay means having other people pay your medical bills, and that leads to endless demand, which leads to rationing, which leads to insufficient capacity to handle peak demands, like, say, the birth of quadruplets.
If and when Hillary Care II comes, of course there will be no back-up capacity available for Americans (unless you believe Michael Moore and think Cuba’s medical system can provide anything to anyone).
Canada’s vaunted socialized medical system depends on America for more than peak capacity back-up, of course. When was the last time you heard about a new drug being developed by a Canadian pharmaceutical company? Under the price control system in Canada it makes no sense to develop drugs there. Canada lets the United States bear the major burden of drug development (and so does the rest of the world). Our high drug prices and federal research subsidize the world’s medical R&D.

Such is the world of globalization.

Medical Tourism
MMedical Tourists

www.mmedsolution.com

Sphere: Related Content

Bungled prescriptions: why you should check what you’re taking

Posted on 15 August 2007 in Uncategorized by admin

Without even looking at me he snarled: ‘Go away, leave me alone. You’re a horrible mum,’” remembers Nicola, 31. “It was so unlike Kieron - who’s normally so happy and affectionate - that it took my breath away.”Later that night, after Nicola had finally coaxed Kieron out of his room, the little boy started sobbing. “He said he wanted to go to sleep and never wake up,” she recalls now, seven months later.

“When I tried to cheer him up, he just repeated it in a very angry tone. I was shocked. Surely a six-year- old boy wasn’t thinking about taking his own life - how could he even know about such things?”

“It was as if a monster had taken over our son,” says Nicola. So she looked for an explanation.

Three years earlier, Kieron had been diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia - cancer of the white blood cells, where too many immature white cells are produced.

In November 2004, he began a cycle of low-dose chemotherapy, combined with a steroid called dexamethasone which he took for five days a month.

Dexamethasone is a corticosteroid - it mimics the use of the hormones made by the adrenal glands - and was being used to reduce the number of white blood cells being produced in Kieron’s body.

“During the days he was on the steroids he would always be a bit grumpy and out of sorts,” his mother recalls. “His strange behaviour coincided with the steroids.

“But he’d been taking them for more than two years so although I wondered about it, I couldn’t quite see how, after all that time, they’d suddenly affect him.”

In fact, Kieron had been the victim of a hospital error.

In January this year, his oncologist at St James’s Hospital in Leeds had prescribed him 4.6mg of the drug. This was to be split into two doses, but the pharmacist mistakenly calculated this as

As a result, Kieron was taking 5.6mg per day - over 20 per cent more than he should have done. No one double-checked the dose or spotted the error.

Kieron was overdosing on a very dangerous drug. Known side-effects of steroids include inflammation of the stomach, mood swings and depression.

“In February, Kieron started another five-day course of the steroids,” says Nicola. “This time he was worse. He was telling me he hated us all and then clinging to me like a frightened baby. Normally, he loved school, but now he would sit in class shouting over and over again that he wanted to go home.

“Once, he refused to drink all day. He hit and kicked the other children and would scream at me as I left to take him home. Yet a few days later he was back to his normal, easy-going self.”

That same month, during a hospital visit, Nicola and her partner Simon England, 32, a taxi driver, still shaken by their son’s mood change, asked if Kieron could see a child psychologist.

“We hoped that he might say that it was just childish talk, but he took it very seriously,” says Nicola, who is a care worker for the mentally ill. “He explained that a child of Kieron’s age usually had no concept of suicide, yet his words definitely hinted at suicidal tendencies.

“He told us not to dismiss his fears, but to keep reassuring him that he was safe.”

A few days later Nicola told the oncologist about Kieron’s behaviour. “I said I was frightened about how he changed when he was taking the steroids. She told me to ask the pharmacist to log his reaction to the drug. The pharmacist listened to what I had to say, went away with the prescription and returned a few minutes later.

“She said she was sorry, there had been a mistake and Kieron had been given the wrong dose of steroids for the past two months.

“I was completely numb and left without saying anything.

“Later I became angry. We weren’t dealing with a minor drug for a minor illness. My son was being treated for leukaemia under the care of a world-class cancer team. How could such a sloppy mistake be allowed to happen, and how often was it happening to other people?”

Far too often, if you are one of the families affected.

Earlier this month it was reported that two cancer patients at Birmingham Heartlands Hospital died after they were given an overdose of a drug used to relieve the side-effects of chemotherapy.

Another distressing case was that of Madison Perry, who, aged just two-and-a-half months, was given an overdose of heparin, a blood-thinning drug, at Liverpool’s Alder Hey Hospital after heart surgery in February 2005. The dose had been calculated at 1,500 units, but a nurse read it as 15,000 and Madison died the next day.

Last November Cathy Horton won damages from her GP and Lloyds Pharmacy after she was prescribed steroid tablets eight times the strength of her normal dose. The dispensing chemist didn’t pick up the GP’s mistake and Cathy was admitted to hospital with anxiety and paranoia.

In January, 2001, 18-year-old cancer patient Wayne Jowett had a toxic chemotherapy drug injected into his spine rather than into a vein. Wayne, who was actually in remission from his cancer when the drug was administered, suffered intense pain before lapsing into unconsciousness for nearly a month and dying slowly from a creeping paralysis that eventually stopped his heart.

A study on medication errors published by the Healthcare Commission in 2001 found that around 1,200 patients had died in the previous year due to an error in prescription or an adverse reaction to the drug.

One hospital reported several mistakes, including a cancer patient being prescribed the sleeping tablet Temazepam instead of the anti-cancer drug Tamoxifen; a toxic medicine that was prescribed daily instead of weekly; and a contraceptive steroid prescribed in place of an anti-psychotic drug.

Last year the National Patient Safety Agency reported that about 6.5 per cent of all patients admitted to hospital between January 2005 and June 2006 “experienced medication-related harm”. Although 80 per cent of those resulted in no injury to the patient, there were 92 incidents of severe harm or death.

Most of these errors (around 57 per cent) were due, as in Kieron’s case, to the patient receiving the wrong frequency or strength of dose. Ten per cent affected children under four years old.

The agency admitted the figures were likely to be conservative and did not take account of errors made in community pharmacies.

Jennifer Emerson, a solicitor at the legal firm Irwin Mitchell, which specialises in medical law, believes that cases are greatly under-reported.

“The responsible agencies may say their data gives them an idea of error rates,” she says. “But in the past, researchers have adopted different definitions and categories under which errors are reported, making their findings quite disjointed.

“Their figures also often depend on the voluntary reporting of errors.”

She adds: “People do not always realise they have been the victim of a medication error. They may attribute any unusual effects to their illness, so the error never comes to light.

“Yet it is a significant health issue and the implications for the individual can vary from relatively short-term effects to fatality. Any death is one death too many and a tragedy for the patients and their families.

“Even if you haven’t been severely injured, the repercussions can be very distressing. You may have to undergo hospital investigations, sometimes for many months, all on top of your original illness.”

Pharmacists don’t deny the problem is real or significant - the question is what to do about it.

As Professor Nick Barber, head of the department of practice and policy at The School of Pharmacy, London University, says: “You are dealing with humans, who sometimes make mistakes. The problem for pharmacists is that their mistakes can be very dangerous indeed.”

The family of Elsie Phythian discovered this in February this year. Elsie, 89, from Manchester, was prescribed 100mg of Carbamazepine after falling out of bed and bumping her forehead. She took the drug three times a day as prescribed, but three days later she had a stroke.

Although the prescription read 100mg, Lloyds Pharmacy in Clayton had filled the box with 200mg tablets - so Elsie had been taking double the dose. She went on to spend two months in hospital and now, this previously fit and well grandmother needs 24-hour care.

Lloyds Pharmacy admitted negligence, although not that this was the cause of Elsie’s stroke.

According to Professor Barber, there should be a checking system in every pharmacy. But what happened to this checking system in Kieron’s or Elsie’s case is unclear.

To be fair to pharmacists, most medication errors - nearly 70 per cent - occur when the prescription is handwritten. Computerised prescription in GP surgeries has eliminated this problem in community pharmacies. But in most hospitals, prescriptions are still written by hand.

“In fact, medication errors make up only a small fraction of hospital safety issues,” says Professor Bryony Dean Franklin, of the department of practice and policy at London University’s School of Pharmacy.

“And although the figures may seem frightening, you have to see it in context: around two and a half million prescriptions are written every day.” The vast majority are correct.

In 2005 Professor Dean Franklin published the results of a survey she carried out in the pharmacy department of a Welsh hospital.

Over a two-week period her team found that although there were mistakes made in 2.1 per cent of all prescriptions, only one in 100 of those mistakes made it through to be given to the patient. The rest were picked up in the checking process that should be part of every hospital pharmacy.

However, this means little to those who are affected, and Nicola England is understandably wary of prescriptions after Kieron’s experiences. “When it first happened I became a bit of crusader,” she says. “I told everyone I knew that they should double-check their medication and query it.

“I did question Kieron’s prescription in January because it had been changed. But they said the dose had altered because his weight had changed. They were the professionals, so I accepted it.”

“People do tend to believe that prescriptions are gospel,” says Vanessa Bourne of the Patients Association. “But mistakes can be made, just like any other form of medicine. If you are taking a prescribed drug and you feel strange, then don’t feel that it is ‘just you’. Report your experiences to your pharmacist.”

After Nicola complained about what had happened to her son, the chief executive of the Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust wrote to say “a full inquiry” had been carried out into the incident. She said procedures had been reviewed to ensure such errors wouldn’t be repeated.

Nicola was also told that there was little likelihood of lasting adverse side-effects affecting Kieron from such a short-term overdose. But she is dissatisfied with the response.

“I can’t help but think what would have happened if there had been a similar mistake with Kieron’s chemotherapy drugs when he was really sick, or if the overdose had been bigger,” she says. “I don’t feel I have had decent answers to those questions.”

Kieron has finished his treatment and is in remission. But if he did have to be readmitted to hospital, Nicola says she would be very wary about what was given to her son.

“I don’t trust the hospital any longer,” she says. “I know that sounds harsh, because they’ve worked hard to care for my son, but if basic mistakes like that can happen, you have to think about what else is going wrong in the system.

Sphere: Related Content

Dangerous Carcinogen in Plastics

Posted on 5 August 2007 in Uncategorized by admin

Bisphenol A (BPA) — a chemical commonly found in hard plastics — has for the first time been linked to female reproductive disorders in a strongly-worded statement released by 38 scientists and published online in the journal Reproductive Toxicology. The compound, which is used in a variety of consumer items such as polycarbonate plastic baby bottles, microwave oven dishes and sports bottles, often seeps from containers and enters the bodies of humans.

After reviewing close to 700 studies, the scientists determined that people are regularly exposed to BPA levels that exceed those harmful to lab animals — singling out infants and fetuses as the most vulnerable. The statement was accompanied by a new National Institutes of Health (NIH) study that found that uterine damage caused by BPA exposure in newborn animals might predict a host of reproductive disorders in women — including endometriosis, cystic ovaries, fibroids and cancers. While earlier studies had linked early-stage cancers and lower sperm counts in animals to low BPA doses, no study had ever linked exposure to female reproductive diseases.

Not surprisingly, the plastics industry balked at the findings, labeling the scientists as biased and alarmist; they also rejected the BPA link to reproductive diseases as unfounded and based on uncertain science. Representatives cited the conclusions reached by two government scientific committees in Europe and Japan — that decided there was insufficient evidence to restrict BPA’s use because of metabolic differences between mice and humans — as proof of BPA’s safe use.

Frederick vom Saal, a reproductive toxicologist at the University of Missouri-Columbia, countered by claiming: “There is essentially no difference in the way that rat or mouse cells respond to BPA and the way that humans respond to it,” adding that while the amount in humans “may seem like an incredibly small amount, it causes effects in human cells at the part-per-trillion level.” Though no studies have yet been conducted linking BPA exposure to direct human effects, the scientists hope to generate interest in human research with their statement.

“We know what doses the animals were given, and when we look at humans, we see blood levels within that range or actually higher, which is a cause of concern and should stimulate more human research,” said Jerrold Heindel of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. A panel set up by the NIH’s Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction — responsible for a preliminary BPA report released earlier this year that was drafted by a consulting firm with financial ties to the chemical industry — will convene next week to decide whether to declare the chemical a human reproductive toxin.

Here’s at least hoping that sound science eventually wins the day in clarifying this worrisome health issue, regardless of the outcome. If BPA is labeled a human reproductive toxin, however, you can bet that we’ll soon witness a significant decline in the use of plastics unless measures are taken to replace the chemical with something more benign.

Sphere: Related Content

Medical Tourism

Posted on 1 August 2007 in Uncategorized by admin

More and more people are turning to what has been called “Medical Tourism”

Medical tourism is surgery performed outside the United States - often in what used to be called backward ” Third World” Countries. Patients pay a fraction of what it might cost back home. Post operative care may be provided at what you might think are 4 star resorts or luxury hotels. Sure beats the cafeteria food and scenery at most American hospitals.

It may be the case that a hip replacement is essential for a person in order to function at work and live independently. Hip replacement surgery is more than a common occurence in today’s world. However by the time the patient is offered the surgery their medical insurance may not cover it , the cost of the surgery may have increased with ordinary inflation , other emergency non medical costs may have come up , or even that the patient is no longer employed and covered by health insurance.

What may cost a small fortune - say the standard $ 100,000 may be available for a more affordable $ 10,000.

It all can work out even with airfare overseas and accomodation overseas to only 10 - 15 % of the standard US health care costs.

Such is the world of globalization.

Medical Tourism
MMedical Tourists

www.mmedsolution.com

Sphere: Related Content